Former PM Bennett Commits to Enabling Government Change Regardless of Role
In a detailed interview with "Weekend News" on August 22, 2026, former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett discussed his political journey, his brief handover with Benjamin Netanyahu in 2021, and his views on current Israeli leadership and security challenges. Bennett emphasized his commitment to facilitating a government change, stating he would accept even the most minor role if necessary to achieve this goal.
Bennett recounted his short 30-minute transition meeting with Netanyahu upon becoming Prime Minister in June 2021, describing Netanyahu as defeated and uncooperative, especially regarding Iran's nuclear threat. He expressed deep disappointment that Netanyahu withheld critical information about Iran's nuclear program, which Bennett labeled as the gravest security failure in Israel's history. According to Bennett, Netanyahu neglected to prepare Israel adequately against Iran's nuclear advancements, forcing Bennett to urgently address the gap upon taking office.
The former PM also criticized Netanyahu's leadership style, describing him as authoritarian and disconnected from democratic values, and accused him of undermining Israel's stability. Bennett revealed that Netanyahu threatened to deploy a harsh smear campaign against him if he formed a government, similar to the one against Gideon Sa'ar.
Regarding his political alliances, Bennett spoke about his long-standing friendship with Ayelet Shaked but acknowledged their political paths have diverged due to differing visions. He also expressed sympathy for former ally Idith Silman, who he said lacks substance.
Bennett stressed that his political evolution reflects a pragmatic approach focused on saving Israel rather than ideological rigidity. He reaffirmed his readiness to support whichever leader emerges from the upcoming elections to replace the current government, prioritizing national interest over personal ambition.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.