Likud Primaries Defy Left-Wing Fearmongering with Diverse, Voter-Driven Slate

The Likud party's recent primaries concluded with a diverse and combative list of candidates, disproving the left-wing media's dire predictions of a "Haredi takeover" or destructive political deals. Despite intense fear campaigns in the media portraying the primaries as a threat to the party's future, Likud voters demonstrated independent judgment by electing candidates based on authentic grassroots work rather than large campaign budgets.

Notably, Almog Cohen secured a spot on the list despite entering the race late and lacking significant campaign resources, highlighting the electorate's appreciation for genuine contribution. Unlike other parties where candidate lists are often decided behind closed doors, Likud's process empowered registered members to determine their representatives, reflecting a vibrant internal democracy.

The resulting slate combines experienced activists with fresh faces, prepared to address Israel's security, political, and social challenges ahead. The article calls for unity within Likud following the primaries and dismisses the left-wing's concerns as misplaced, suggesting they focus on their own political issues instead.

The coverage underscores the contrast between media narratives and the actual democratic process within Likud, emphasizing the party members' decisive role in shaping their leadership for the 2026 elections.