Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories (in the app)
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the monthly limit

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Live Terminal

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories (in the app)
  • The daily brief by email
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the monthly limit

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

FIFA Rejects Offside Claims in Qatar-Switzerland World Cup Penalty Controversy

Translated & summarized from Mako by baba
The story · English

Qatar earned a historic 1-1 draw with Switzerland on Sunday in a World Cup match that quickly became known online as the tournament’s first VAR controversy. The dispute came in the first half, when Switzerland was awarded a penalty after a clear foul by Qatar’s goalkeeper in the box, but replays appeared to show the fouled Swiss player was offside when moving to the ball.

Despite that suspicion, the VAR room did not call the referee to review the incident. The broadcast also did not show proof, through its special animation, that the attacker was not offside. The penalty stood, and Breel Embolo scored Switzerland’s opening goal.

Hours after the match, FIFA released its own evidence and said there had been no offside. In its explanation, FIFA said, “During the match, a brief technical issue prevented the creation of the graphic animation for determining the offside line before the penalty decision in Switzerland’s favor in the 14th minute. The issue was resolved quickly, and the VAR workflow was not affected by this malfunction and proceeded according to the regular procedure in reviewing the on-field referee’s decision. The lines used by the VAR officials to examine the relevant players’ positions did not show that the attacking player was in an offside position in either of the two situations immediately preceding the penalty decision.”

Still, some outlets that cover the laws of the game and VAR criticized the decision and blamed a SAOT error. Archivo VAR wrote that it was “a FIFA blunder,” saying the published image with the drawn lines appeared to show the attacker’s foot on the line while the defender’s foot was not touching it.

Read the original at Mako
Full coverage · 3 outlets
100% centerFirst: Mako · Jun 13

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 3
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the live terminal