AI Transforms Legal Work But Cannot Replace Human Lawyers, Expert Says

Artificial intelligence tools have rapidly advanced in the legal field, enabling the drafting of contracts, legal documents, and letters within seconds. However, attorney Chen Boaron explains why AI cannot fully replace human lawyers, especially when handling high-value deals worth hundreds of thousands or millions of shekels. She emphasizes that practical experience, professional responsibility, and the ability to anticipate future scenarios are irreplaceable qualities that no algorithm can replicate.

Boaron clarifies that a lawyer's role extends far beyond drafting documents. The real work involves understanding the client's true needs, identifying hidden risks, and constructing protections that hold up even in unforeseen circumstances. While AI can gather information and produce convincing text, it lacks the capacity to grasp the full context of a transaction or dispute and may provide answers that sound plausible but are inappropriate for the specific case.

A critical distinction between AI systems and lawyers is accountability. When AI generates incorrect or unsuitable documents, there is no responsible party to bear the consequences. In contrast, lawyers sign off on their work, remain professionally accountable, and continue to manage issues that arise after agreements are signed. Furthermore, AI cannot conduct negotiations, respond to new demands, or creatively resolve unexpected crises, all of which require real-time judgment and decision-making.

Boaron advises that AI should be viewed as a valuable tool to enhance efficiency and information gathering in legal processes, not as a substitute for human judgment. Clients ultimately seek security and confidence that someone is thinking ahead about potential scenarios they might not have considered. She concludes, "Technology can advise, draft, and assist, but when your rights, money, and future are at stake, you need a person responsible for the outcome who fights for your interests."