Opposition to Netanyahu Reflects Deep Political Crisis Beyond One Leader
Political commentator Dan Perry argues that the opposition to Benjamin Netanyahu and the Likud party is not merely personal but represents a critical political stance against the policies and governance style that threaten Israel's future. Perry highlights widespread confusion in public discourse, where many identify as "right-wing" based on sentiments rather than actual policies, leading to a mischaracterization of the political landscape. He stresses that the current right-wing, led by Likud and its extremist and ultra-Orthodox partners, has brought a series of disasters to Israel.
Perry points to systemic issues such as the growing ultra-Orthodox sector's refusal to integrate into core education, workforce participation, and military service, while benefiting from extensive public subsidies. He also criticizes the weakening of the judiciary through politicized appointments and the erosion of institutional checks, warning this trend risks turning Israel into a "selected dictatorship." Perry compares the Likud's trajectory to the historical failures of the Mapai party, emphasizing the urgent need for Likud to leave power, not because the right-wing itself is problematic, but because this particular right-wing leadership is harmful.
The article further condemns Netanyahu personally for corruption, scandals, divisive rhetoric, and obstructing investigations, including those related to the October 7 events. Perry dismisses calls for political unity under Netanyahu, arguing that true national repair requires a large governing majority and a small opposition, which is incompatible with Likud's current principles and influence. He suggests that even if Netanyahu steps down, the party must undergo a prolonged period of reflection and punishment for its past actions.
Ultimately, Perry concludes that the slogan "Only Not Bibi" is insufficient; the real issue is rejecting the destructive path Likud has taken. He advocates for leadership that serves the country responsibly, contrasting it with Netanyahu's personalistic and authoritarian style. This stance is framed as necessary for Israel's survival and democratic health ahead of the 2026 elections.
