Israeli Government Votes to Defy Supreme Court Ruling Amid Netanyahu's Legal Restrictions
On Sunday, the Israeli government unanimously voted to refuse compliance with a recent Supreme Court ruling concerning the Second Authority for Television and Radio, a move that escalates Israel's constitutional crisis. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not attend the cabinet meeting or comment on the decision, as he is currently barred from handling legal matters due to ongoing criminal charges and trial against him. The initiative was led by Justice Minister Yariv Levin and Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi, who pushed the government to declare that any court ruling contradicting the law would not be recognized, effectively freezing the government's plan to alter the composition of the Second Authority council.
This decision directly challenges the Supreme Court's authority, which had previously indicated suspicions that council members' resignations were intended to obstruct judicial proceedings. The government’s statement emphasized that it would not acknowledge any appointments or actions by the council unless they meet explicit legal criteria, including approvals related to the potential sale of Channel 13 to a group of tech investors.
Historically, Netanyahu has publicly supported the judiciary and the rule of law. In 2015, he defended the Supreme Court's decision to demolish unauthorized buildings in the West Bank settlement of Beit El, affirming Israel's commitment to democracy and legal rulings. In 2019, he reiterated that court decisions are binding on all, countering then-Justice Minister Amir Ohana’s suggestion that some rulings could be disregarded for security reasons. Former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak also praised Netanyahu in 2022 for his longstanding defense of Israel's judicial system prior to his indictment.
The current government stance marks a significant departure from Netanyahu’s previous positions, deepening tensions between Israel’s executive branch and judiciary. The refusal to honor the Supreme Court ruling on the Second Authority is expected to provoke further legal and political confrontations in the coming weeks.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.