MK Rotman Criticizes Supreme Court and Legal Advisors Over Election Restrictions and Calls for Override Clause
On Sunday, MK Simcha Rotman, chairman of the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee and member of the Religious Zionism party, sharply criticized legal advisors and the Supreme Court for limiting government actions during the election period. In an interview with ynet, Rotman accused legal advisors of imposing "absurd legal claims" to restrict ministers and said the Attorney General is preventing the government from acting due to the approaching elections.
Rotman expressed concern over the Attorney General's broad powers, citing the controversial handling of criminal cases involving former Prime Minister Netanyahu and administrative matters. He warned that unlike the previous government, which was allowed to operate despite losing public trust, the current government will face stricter constraints during the election period. He also condemned the Supreme Court, stating that while its rulings should be respected when lawful, "when it disregards the laws, we will listen to the law."
He voiced hope that after the elections, the Knesset will pass the "override clause" to limit judicial activism. Rotman also criticized the Supreme Court's recent decision to annul the Knesset vote for State Comptroller Michael Regev, calling it an overreach and arguing that judicial review of Knesset procedures threatens the separation of powers.
Regarding the coalition's legislative push before the Knesset's dissolution, Rotman dismissed opposition concerns about repealing laws after elections, challenging their hysteria. He also commented on MK Yuli Edelstein's announcement to leave Likud and start a new political path, emphasizing his belief in a healthy democracy and the need for a strong, united right-wing bloc to represent the national public, opposing political boycotts.
Rotman's remarks reflect ongoing tensions between the Israeli government, judiciary, and legal advisors amid a politically charged election season.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
