Israeli Communications Minister Acknowledges Political Deal with Ultra-Orthodox Parties on Broadcasting Reform
Israeli Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi confirmed a secret political deal with Shas leader Aryeh Deri, agreeing to advance a kosher certification reform in exchange for ultra-Orthodox support of a broadcasting law aimed at weakening the media. The deal was initially reported by N12 and involves controversial changes to the state broadcasting system, including a government app replacing "Idan Plus".
The Knesset Communications Committee convened on June 29, 2026, to discuss coalition members' objections to the broadcasting law, particularly from ultra-Orthodox parties who oppose unresolved issues such as Sabbath desecration and restrictions on explicit content in the new government app. When questioned by MK Eitan Ginzburg (Blue and White) about the deal, Karhi openly stated, "I am very much in favor of political deals, I am a politician."
In a surprising move, MK Avi Maoz announced his resignation from the Communications Committee and declared he would vote against the law if it remains unchanged. Maoz criticized the law for enabling Sabbath desecration and harming Israel's Jewish character, stating, "Sabbath desecration is above any deal. If you want to vote for desecration, shame on you. You will betray your mission."
Committee Chair Galit Distel-Atbaryan acknowledged the complexity of the issue, calling it "bigger than us, it is coalition-related." Despite Karhi's commitment to the ultra-Orthodox, objections concerning the app's operation on the Sabbath and the presentation of sexual content will not be resolved within the committee and will be deferred to the full Knesset. Legal advisor Pinchas Gerot warned that voting differently in committee than in the plenary would constitute a significant legislative flaw.
Following Distel-Atbaryan's remarks, coalition and opposition members jointly voted down Maoz's objection. The controversy highlights tensions within the coalition over balancing religious sensitivities with media reforms.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.