Leak Probe: Netanyahu Aide Suspected of Deleting Phone Evidence After Feldstein Arrest
Jonathan Urich, a close adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is suspected in the investigation into the leak affair involving the German paper Bild of severe security offenses, obstruction of an investigation, and destroying evidence. According to the suspicion, the day after spokesperson Eli Feldstein was arrested, Urich erased all data from his mobile phone, including his messages with Feldstein.
Investigators say the phone records also show that on the morning Feldstein was taken into custody, Urich called him only once. Prosecutors found that significant because Urich reportedly used to call Feldstein many times a day, especially if he did not answer, and the single call while Feldstein was already being questioned strengthened their view that Urich intentionally deleted material. Urich told investigators he replaced phones about once every six months, but police and prosecutors say that was false and that he actually changed devices only every year and a half or so, with later claims in court saying it was once every two years.
The case also builds on testimony from former Shin Bet chief Ronen Bar, who said he informed Netanyahu of Feldstein’s arrest shortly after it happened. Prosecutors argue the total evidence shows Urich destroyed evidence deliberately, contrary to his claim that the actions were accidental.
At the Tel Aviv District Court on Tuesday, the prosecution’s request to renew restrictive conditions on Urich was rejected, and he was allowed to keep working in the Prime Minister’s Office. The prosecutor said Urich had contradicted Netanyahu’s testimony by claiming that all spokespeople work directly with the prime minister, and argued that he presents a high risk of obstruction and serious harm. Judge Ala Masarwa said the danger decreases over time and noted that nearly two years have passed since the events, adding that it was hard to accept the claim that obstruction risk had suddenly returned after so long.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.