After Iran’s 2-2 draw with New Zealand at the World Cup in the United States, the article says FIFA barred fans from bringing the historic Iranian flag, the Lion and Sun banner used before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, into stadiums. Iranian exiles in California, where Iran played its first match, challenged the ban in court but lost. Even so, thousands of the prohibited flags were seen in the stands, and loud boos greeted the anthem of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
The piece argues that the dispute is about far more than a flag. It says the exiles wanted to support their team while asserting memory, belonging, identity, and a different idea of homeland, away from what it calls the Islamic regime. In the author’s view, modern life tries to weaken nationalism, but sports remains the last arena where people are still allowed to be openly national.
To support that claim, the article points to history. It recalls the ancient Greek Olympic truce, when city-states stopped fighting so athletes and spectators could travel safely. It also cites the 1990 World Cup in Italy, described as the most geopolitical in history, when the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia appeared for the last time as united teams, while Italy’s own north-south divide was exposed and Diego Maradona told Naples that people who had long been treated as second-class citizens were suddenly being asked to be Italian.
The article also mentions the 1980 Winter Olympics, where the U.S. hockey team’s win over the Soviet Union, during the Iran hostage crisis and the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, became the “Miracle on Ice.” It says the victory restored American self-belief. The author closes by arguing that even in a globalized world, people still need a flag, a shared story, and a home.
