Politics14:27 · 36m ago

Gadi Eisenkot's October 7th Campaign Tactics Under Scrutiny

Arutz ShevaRight
Translated & summarized from Arutz Sheva by baba
The story · English

Strategic consultant Roni Rimon is weighing in on the effectiveness and potential pitfalls of Gadi Eisenkot's election campaign, which prominently features audio and visual elements from the October 7th Hamas attack. Rimon explained that the true impact of such a campaign can only be measured through pre-campaign research and post-campaign polling, data he does not possess. He noted that Eisenkot's target audience is likely the 8-10 Knesset seats that have shifted from the Likud to the opposition, a demographic that Benny Gantz, Avigdor Lieberman, and Gideon Sa'ar aim to retain, while Benjamin Netanyahu seeks to win back.

Rimon suggested that if professional analysis confirms a positive effect on this target demographic, the campaign strategy is sound. However, he raised concerns about the rapid, AI-driven nature of modern political discourse, questioning whether campaign decisions stem from a coherent strategy or reactive tactics. He intuitively feels that emphasizing October 7th could be impactful, especially with elections potentially occurring around the anniversary of the attack.

He acknowledged that if the aggressive use of October 7th material is believed to reduce votes for the ruling coalition, the approach might be valid, but stressed this remains unproven. Some argue that focusing on Israel's post-attack military successes and improved security for southern residents, or issues like the ultra-Orthodox draft, might be more influential for voters considering a switch.

Regarding the Likud's potential counter-narrative, accusing Eisenkot of contributing to the 'conception' that led to the massacre as former IDF Chief of Staff, Rimon stated that such claims can be simplified into concise messages if evidence exists. He also noted the Likud's argument that following Eisenkot's advice post-October 7th might have prevented current military achievements.

Addressing the controversy surrounding Eisenkot's campaign using recordings of terrorists from October 7th, which has caused distress to Gaza border residents, Rimon validated their claims. He stated that campaign strategists must consider whether electoral benefits outweigh the potential harm to those directly traumatized by the events, framing it as a moral and ethical dilemma. While acknowledging the effectiveness of using authentic, impactful audio, he stressed the need to weigh the associated costs and ethical implications.

Read the original at Arutz Sheva
Open the live terminal